An Examination of Bias in Focus on the Family’s Website Essay

Part of the job with criticizing religion is the fact that any exertion to tap yields a label of bigotry. In some other words, if you appargonnt motion or criticize a religious movement the result is that the person putting forth the check is an anti-Semite or anti-Christian. plot in many cases, this is true, further in other cases, that is simply non the case.But, because of the emotional hamper to religious beliefs particularly the beliefs of individuals who hold unafraid fundamentalist beliefs any attempt to question is met with anger. This is even when the recognize being questi oned is something that is perfect(a) opinion open to debate and non a fact that is set in stone. Dr. James dobson, the head of the Evangelical throng direction on the Family, is hardly an stupid(p) man.He is a published seed and charismatic leader of a wide-ranging denomination of conservative Christian groups. While thither will be those who ar dismissive of Christian conservative scarce because they are, well, Christian conservatives, is childish. Criticism about semipolitical or sociological issues derived from bias and opinion, however, is bazaar game for debate. One such issue of contention on the website involves the assertion that gayness can be cured. To this regard, the website statesHomosexuality is more than likely to be related to one or more of the following (1) perplexity of role models seen in parents, including, but not limited to, a dominant dumbfound and a weak or hit father (2) serious family dysfunction that wounds and modify the child (3) early sexual insult (4) the influence of an older homosexual during a critical period of adolescence (5) conscious filling and cultivation and/or (6) homosexual experimentation, such as mutual masturbatory activity, by boys in early adolescence. How do these and other forces interplay in individual circumstances? I take upt know. I dont think anyone knows.An Examination of Bias in Focus on t he Familys Website paginate 2 On the other hand, I am certain that homosexuality does not result from irresistible genetic influences, as some would have us believe. (dobson) To take these statements are biased and agenda operate would be an understatement. While Dobson is entitle to his opinions, the operative word here is opinion. The statements do in that excerpt are presented as fact when, in reality, at that place is no empirical proof that they are factual. Instead, the statements are presented to provide circular logic believability to a socio-political agenda.Now, it is well within Dobsons right to present his face of the issue. However, it is not a balanced psychometric test of the issue and it contradicts a wealth of psychiatric and sociological study on the issue. Because of this, there is a great deal of noetic dishonesty in these statements of homosexuality. A more proper examination would present Dobsons opinion while acknowledging there are other opinions on th e outlet from professional fields, include a commendation from a peer reviewed journal on the theatre and then provide a link to a website that provides an alternate visor of view.This does not mean that Dobson should withdraw from his beliefs nor should Focus on the Family retract their statements, but the organization would be far get around served presenting an unbiased look at the subject and avoid presenting opinion as fact. Bibliography Focus on the Family. (2007) http//listen. family. org/daily/A000000198. cfm Dobson, James. (2006) Do You trust Homosexuality is Inherited. Retrieved 4 February 2007. http//family. custhelp. com/ cgi-bin/family. cfg/php/enduser/std_alp. php? p_sid=6n4Jcohi